<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=654132&amp;fmt=gif">

India's Joint Parliamentary Committee Announces Recommended Changes to Privacy Bill

Last month, the Indian Joint Parliamentary Committee submitted its report on the 2019 Personal Data Protection Bill after two years of consideration, research, and analysis. The bill, while not a certainty but likely to pass, would replace what some consider to be archaic data protection regulations. Although not finalized, the biggest obstacle if implemented as envisioned is strict data localization. India has been in the group of countries legislating data privacy for decades, culminating in the 2021 JPC report submission. Here’s a look at the history of data privacy legislation in India.

 

The History of Data Privacy Legislation in India

  • 2000 – Information Technology Act is passed by parliament and signed by President K.R. Narayanan addressing electronic documents, e-signatures, and record authentication.
  • 2017 – The Indian Supreme Court hears Justice KS Puttaswamy vs Union of Indiaand passes a historic judgment affirming the constitutional right to privacy.
  • 2019 – Introduction of the Personal Data Protection Bill and immediately sent to the JPC to be examined.
  • 2021 – JPC submits report on PDP to Indian Parliament revisions.

 

The long-awaited report submitted December 16, 2021 by the JPC has provided necessary clarification and modifications that seek to enhance the syntax and governance of the bill.

 

The recommended amendments are as follows:

  • Scope – The bill has a proposed name change to Data Protection Bill and will cover both personal and non-personal data which is unusual as distinction of data type can be difficult when managing mass amounts of data. Clauses also address the deceased and transfer of minor rights (see Clause 16 below).
  • Implementation Timeline – The report outlines a timeline with a 24-month implementation period for data processors to comply.
  • Definitions – The following terms have been defined or revised: consent manager, data auditor, data breach, data fiduciary, data processor, data protection officer, harm, and non-personal data.
  • Clauses 13 & 14 – These clauses apply to consent of personal data processing for employment and legitimate interest, marrying the interests of both the data principal and data fiduciary.
  • Clause 16 – Entities dealing with the data of children must register with the DPA and are required to communicate with the subject 3 months prior to adult age to regain consent and “must continue providing the services to the child unless the child withdraws consent.”

 

The implementation timeline for the Data Protection Bill is still unknown but will likely be a phased approach. Like California, there is discussion of an oversight committee called the Data Protection Authority of India that would supervise compliance with the proposed law. With the notable amendments to the bill, it’s unlikely we’ll see this come to fruition quickly. Not unlike most proposed privacy legislation, it has been met with dissent and opposition and will have to make its way through the courts of India before becoming law.

 

All Posts

Update: Senate Vote on Colorado Privacy Act is In

The Colorado State Senate has unanimously passed the Colorado Privacy Act which will now move to the State Assembly for voting. The current session continues until June 12, 2021, giving time for reconciliation between the Colorado Senate and House. 

Truyo's president Dan Clarke says, "I think there is a good chance that is sufficient time to reconcile, especially given the relative attention on this issue and that it passed unanimously." The addition of two House sponsors, Republican Terri Carver and Democrat majority co-whip Monica Dunn also give the bill much-needed support to garner approval from the Colorado State Senate. 

Amendments to the Colorado Privacy Act

Past revisions to the bill are said to have moved the needle from a largely pro-consumer angle to pro-business, according to Husch Blackwell. The current bill passed by the Colorado State Senate reversed those elements in favor of consumers.

Revisions include changes to contractual requirements between controllers and processors similar to the California Privacy Rights Act and Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act, as well as modifications made to the definition of "sale" and consumer right to deletion. Also, an enforcement component that requires the Attorney General and district attorneys to provide a business notice of a violation and 60 days to cure has a sunset date of January 1, 2025.

With these revisions we expect a high likelihood of passage for the Colorado Privacy Act. Truyo will continue to monitor this bill as we approach the June 12th deadline. 

 

Ale Johnson
About Ale Johnson
Ale Johnson is the Marketing Content Specialist at Truyo.
Recent Posts

India's Joint Parliamentary Committee Announces Recommended Changes to Privacy Bill

Last month, the Indian Joint Parliamentary Committee submitted its report on the 2019 Personal Data Protection Bill after two years of consideration, ...

Log4J Vulnerability Update

At Truyo we take data privacy and security very seriously. Recently a security vulnerability was reported in the open-source Java library “Log4J” that...

Forrester Wave Announcement: Truyo Named Strong Performer

Report notes Truyo’s “management and fulfillment of individual privacy rights capabilities are some of the best in the market ” PHOENIX (Dec. 09, 2021...

Human Error: The Pitfalls of Manual SAR Response

In the age of information, organizations have increased the amount of consumer data housed in structured and unstructured environments. As consumers b...